You're right about it all. Chomsky is not saying anything new. I guess the main neat and newsworthy thing is it's a local Tucson guy that did the interview.
However, I had nothing to do with the taping. I have no idea why there was so much movement in either camera. If it was me I would have not touched camera 1 at all so there was always a rock-solid primary shot to count on. And frankly I would have held more shots on camera 2, because even within the role of "secondary, cutaway camera", it was way too mobile.... But, you do what you can with what you're given. I'm just the editor...
guilty as charged
hi Ryn, thanx for logging in and chiming in!
You're right about it all. Chomsky is not saying anything new. I guess the main neat and newsworthy thing is it's a local Tucson guy that did the interview.
However, I had nothing to do with the taping. I have no idea why there was so much movement in either camera. If it was me I would have not touched camera 1 at all so there was always a rock-solid primary shot to count on. And frankly I would have held more shots on camera 2, because even within the role of "secondary, cutaway camera", it was way too mobile.... But, you do what you can with what you're given. I'm just the editor...